Compared with Japan, where is the gap between Chinese science cm68.com

Compared with Japan, where is the gap between Chinese science? Original title: Lu white: compared with Japan, where is the gap between Chinese science? Author: Lu Bai source: the number of public intellectuals about science and technology, people often use the U.S. as benchmark, a careful study of the policy of the United States, mechanism, laws and practices, because the United States is the most developed country in the world. But as a typical Western countries, the United States essentially has a strong spirit of truth-seeking, empirical, plus it realistically, and the courage to explore new in order to be different traditions, strong in the United States is not surprising. In addition, the United States is a country of immigrants, social inclusion of foreign talent is very high. All of these have a great distance with our culture and tradition. Relatively speaking, and neighbors — we geopolitical and cultural similarities to Japan — comparison and analysis, it may be more valuable. Chinese people’s feelings for Japan is very complex, although the two ethnic groups in the race, habits, ways of thinking and culture are very similar, but we are often reluctant to face up to the rise of japan. Despite being defeated by Japan, the Chinese people have never had enough respect for japan. Japan’s science and technology has made great progress in recent years, a series of physical and chemical won the Nobel prize, the Nobel prize in biomedical field even have a breakthrough in 2012, and this year’s award from Japan in biomedical, born in the United States alone, do a few years of post doctoral study Osumi Yoshinori one gains. Japanese scientists won the Nobel Prize, not only enhance the national self-confidence and status in the world, but also to Japan’s economic development has played a certain role in promoting. Today, we learn from Japan’s experience, the study of some of Japan’s practice, may give China’s science and education to bring some lessons. I think from the following several aspects to talk about his own views, in order to attract more people, caused by reflection and discussion: 1) scientists involved in major decisions such as research and development, put forward to deal with the Obama administration’s "brain plan" (BRAIN), a large project of science and technology of Japan’s "brain plan" (MIND) came into being. Similar to the United States, the Japanese government simply said, "to do" brain science program, rather than specify what to do or how to do". This is entirely by a group of senior scientists after extensive absorption of the views of the scientific community, and then repeatedly discussed the formation of a written opinion, the entire strategic plan of the recommendations to the government to help it make decisions. The government can only decide to do or not to do, but can not easily change what to do and how to do". In contrast, the government science and Technology Management Department of us is "what" and "how to do" very positive, even in the opinions and ideas of the management scientists are not the same, the replacement of a number of scientists to discuss, until it meets the idea. We are pleased to see that the Ministry of science and technology has finally begun to reform the allocation of scientific research funds and the development of science and technology policy. This is a good thing, but also the "intellectual", another editor in chief Rao Yi and I had in 2004 as the country’s recommendations. For science and technology policy, including the research field and direction, how much input, Wei相关的主题文章:

Comments are closed.