How to compensate for the loss of land value-added income farmers compensation is relatively low 3edyy

How to allocate the land value-added income? Compensation for landless farmers is relatively low in the first financial daily open since 1999, the country’s total land price has a total of nearly 30 trillion yuan, the number of which local governments take, landless farmers and points to how much? This is related to the "land finance" in an important issue, that is, how the land value-added income distribution? The so-called land value-added benefits, is to change the existing land use or increase the intensity of the development of new net income. In general, the total price of the land transfer fees, compensation objects attached to the ground by crop compensation, relocation compensation costs, land development fees and related service fees five charges, the remaining amount is the land value-added benefits, including payments to farmers for land compensation and resettlement subsidies, farmers social security costs, but also including all kinds of taxes and the premium income collected by the government. What kind of situation is the distribution pattern of the land value-added income of the land lost farmers compensation relatively low? Compared to the public’s view that, on the whole, the current land value-added income distribution in the possession of a higher share of the government, the land expropriated farmers have a lower share. According to a study by the Ministry of Agriculture Agricultural Policy Research Center researcher Liao Hongle in 2008, the national land transfer as an example, in 1995 the per hectare of land leasing income is 661 thousand yuan, of which 472 thousand yuan for the government, collective and farmers receive 189 thousand yuan, the land value-added income distribution proportion of government and collective and farmers for 2.5:1. By 2005, the proportion was expanded to 9.7:1. Collective and farmers land value-added income distribution ratio continues to decline, the direct reason is that the compensation standard of land acquisition is far behind the increase in land prices. Liao Hongle’s research shows that 1995 – 2005 years, land prices rose by a factor of 3.6, while the land acquisition compensation standards have only increased by a factor of 0.5. If compared with the government’s commercial land transfer income, the proportion of collective and farmers in the land value-added income distribution will be lower. According to a survey of a city in the eastern part of 2007, the government expropriated commercial development for land and unused land, paddy farmers collective construction, the government and the collective and the farmers’ land value-added income distribution ratio were 48:1, 98:1 and 196:1. However, there are some economically developed regions (in the country, the proportion is not high), industrial and commercial development in their own land to engage in collective economic organizations, the land value-added income is mainly composed of the peasants and collective possession, national distribution in the low proportion of value-added benefits. In recent years, the city construction land prices rose rapidly, while the compensation standard did not make the appropriate adjustment, improve the new farmers’ social security costs are limited, resulting in the collective and farmers in a more disadvantageous position in the land value increment distribution. As a matter of fact, farmers have made a difficult struggle to change the disadvantageous position in the distribution of land appreciation. In the last ten years, farmers’ group events have been increasing, and the distribution of land value-added income is not reasonable. In order to protect the interests of farmers, in recent years, the central government has repeatedly stressed the transformation of existing land.相关的主题文章:

Comments are closed.